SpiritualWiki

Wiki / Biologie

Wiki-Menu:  

2·2012


Hawkins-Menu:


 

Biologie – Neue Biologie


 


Blick von Finsterwald auf den Äbnistettenflue, Entlebuch, Schweiz


 

1.   Zitate zum Thema Neue Biologie / New Biology

1.1   Zitate allgemein

  • Manche werden jetzt denken: Will er damit etwa sagen, dass die Menschen Gott sind? Ja, das will ich damit sagen. Natürlich bin ich nicht der Erste, der das behauptet. Es steht schon im Buch Genesis, dass wir nach dem Bilde Gottes erschaffen wurden. Hilfe, jetzt zitiert dieser einstige Weißkittel und Rational sogar noch die Bibel und Jesus, Buddha und Rumi. Bruce H. Lipton, Intelligente Zellen, 2006

 

 

  • Darwin verallgemeinerte das Bevölkerungsgesetz, das der Ökonom Thomas Malthus bereits 1798 aufgestellt hatte: Nicht nur der Mensch, auch alle anderen Arten brächten mehr Nachkommen hervor als überleben können. "Natural selection" bezeichnete Darwin den Mechanismus schon im Titel seines Buches, genauer: "Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life". "Mir ist, als gestünde ich einen Mord ein", schrieb Darwin im Brief an einen Freund. In der Tat, in den Augen vieler Zeitgenossen war es schlimmer als ein Mord. Der Mensch sollte – ohne den besonderen Schöpfungsakt, von dem die Bibel erzählt – aus dem Tierreich hervorgegangen sein, populär ausgedrückt: vom Affen abstammen. Eine Schändung der Menschenwürde und ein Attentat gegen den Schöpfergott. Nicht dass der Darwinismus mit dem christlichen Gottesglauben grundsätzlich unvereinbar gewesen wäre; aber er bot die Möglichkeit, sich die Entwicklung des Lebens auch ohne eine solche planende Intelligenz vorzustellen. Josef Tutsch, "Mir ist, als gestünde ich einen Mord ein". Vor 200 Jahren wurde Charles Darwin geboren, präsentiert von Magazin Scienzz.de, Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 10. Februar 2009

1.2   Zitate von Elisabet Sahtouris, Geobiologin (USA)

Kooperierende Zellverbände sind Vorläufer [Entsprechungen] des erdumspannenden Netzwerkens

  • Jede menschliche Zelle ist ein Kollektiv der uralten früher lebenden Bakterien-Typen. [...] In der Welt vor zwei Milliarden Jahren gab es nur Bakterien. Der Wandel von einem sehr ausbeuterischen, zerstörerischen Lebensweise zur kooperativen Lebensweise unter den Bakterien [Zellen mit Zellkernen] ist eine wunderbare Parallele zu dem, was in der heutigen Welt der Menschen vor sich geht.
    Interview mit Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinsche kreationistische Evolutionsbiologin, Fördererin des Intelligent Design (ID), Pastistin/Futuristin, ehemalige UN-Beraterin, präsentiert von Telic Thoughts, Interviewer Scott London, August 2007

 

  • Die Darwinsche Geschichtsschreibung bezieht sich nur auf die jugendliche Wachstumsphase.
    Nachhaltige Zukunftsfähigkeit tritt in Kraft, sobald Spezies lernen, einander zu nähren, statt einander zu bekämpfen.
    Eigeninteresse ist gut, so lange es sich innerhalb des Eigeninteresses der Gemeinschaft bewegt.
    Was wir nun benötigen, ist Glokalisierung.
    Miteinander können wir es in die Tat umsetzen.
    Video-Vortrag von Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinsche kreationistische Evolutionsbiologin, Fördererin des Intelligent Design (ID), Pastistin/Futuristin, ehemalige UN-Beraterin, zum Thema After Darwin [Nach Darwin], 3 Teile, YouTube Film, eingestellt 24. April 2007

1.3   Zitate (engl.) allgemein

  • Conventional medicine works with the iron filings, whereas a deeper form of healing would attempt to influence the magnetic field. Most doctors don't see the field, so they're trying to figure out the relationship between the filings without even trying to incorporate the energy field in which they exist. Bruce Lipton, cellular biologist, author, and former associate professor at the University of Wisconsin’s School of Medicine, presaged the field of epigenetics, the mechanism by which nurture controls nature, cited by Arjuna Ardagh, The Translucent Revolution

 

  • We in modern society are seeing signs of a fundamental change in the way we understand ourselves and the way we relate to the universe. Willis Harman and Elizabet Sahtouris, Biology Revisioned, North Atlantic Books, 1. July 1998

 

  • Every cell is an intelligent organism. You can remove it from the body, put it into a Petri dish and it will manage its own life: handle the environment, grow, reproduce and form communities with other cells. In the human body we are dealing with a vast community of cells working together in harmony. In a culture dish, cells behave as individual entities. However, in a body cells act as a community; individuals really cannot do whatever they want because then the coherence of the group will fall apart. Therefore, when cells come together in a community they acquire a central intelligence that is involved with coordinating the activity of the individual cells in the group. The cells actually defer to the higher order of that central voice. A human organism is a community of upwards of fifty trillion cells operating in unison and harmony, trying to conform to the requests and demands of that central voice. And it is the central voice that acquires and learns the perceptions that we must deal with throughout our lives.

    There are three sources of life-controlling perceptions.
  1. Source number one is genetics, which provides for instincts common to all humans, basic things such as automatically pulling your hand out of the fire.
  2. A second set of perceptions is derived from the subconscious mind, the part that controls all the functions we don't have to think about. Once you learn how to walk, the program to control walking becomes part of the subconscious mind. You just have to have the intention of walking and the brain will coordinate the behavior.
  3. The third source of perceptions is from the conscious mind. The conscious mind can rewrite any of the subconscious programs you acquired and you can even go back and change the genetic activity. The conscious mind is unique because it can change an entire history of perceptions in order to engage in different behaviors and life styles. Bruce Lipton, The Biology of Belief, The Wisdom of Your Cells, Part 3

 

  • Hundreds upon hundreds of other scientific studies over the last fifty years have consistently revealed that "invisible forces" of the electromagnetic spectrum profoundly impact every facet of biological regulation. These energies include microwaves, radio frequencies, the visible light spectrum, extremely low frequencies, acoustic frequencies, and even a newly recognized form of force called scalar energy. Specific frequencies and patterns of electromagnetic radiation regulate DNA, RNA and protein syntheses; alter protein shape and function; and control gene regulation, cell division, cell differentiation, morphogenesis, (the process by which cells assemble into organs and tissues), hormone secretion, and nerve growth and function. Each one of these cellular activities is a fundamental behavior that contributes to the unfolding of life. Though these research studies have been published in some of the most respected mainstream biomedical journals, their revolutionary findings have not been incorporated into medical school curriculum. Bruce Lipton Ph.D., The Biology of Belief, referring to Liboff 2004; Goodman and Bank 2002; Sivitz 2000; Jin, et al, 2000; Blackman, et al., 1993; Rosen 1992, Blank 1992; Tsong1989; Yen-Patton et al., 1988

 

  • Religion made incursions into the traditional domain of science with attempts to bring intelligent design into the biology classroom and to choke off human embryonic stem-cell research on religious grounds. Scientists responded with counterincursions. Experts from the hard sciences, like evolutionary biology and cognitive neuroscience, joined anthropologists and psychologists in the study of religion, making God an object of scientific inquiry. Robin Marantz Henig, Darwin’s God, Heavenbound. A scientific exploration of how we have come to believe in God, pg. 2 of 11, New York Times Magazine online NYTimes.com, 4. March 2007

 

Reductionistic scientists ignore "exceptions"

  • In fact, my last published research articles at Stanford University Medical School were delayed for almost a year until all those involved in the studies fully accepted the results and agreed on the interpretation of these unusual experiments. Even though they were intimately involved with these studies, the more conventional scientists in the group chose to ignore the results and consider them to be an “exception” to the established beliefs. Unfortunately, scientific principles cannot have “exceptions,” If a principle has exceptions, it simply means the assumed belief is incomplete or incorrect! Bruce Lipton, Planeta Magazine, issue 328, Interview Part one, Part 2, Part 3, Mônica Tarantino & Eduardo Araia, May 2008

 

  • Biology is in a conundrum full of ideas that can't be scientifically proven, quantum thinking solves such problems as fossil gaps and the huge amount of new life after a catastrophe. Audio interview with Amit Goswami, professor for quantum physics on God is Not Dead, presented by web radio station Beyond the Ordinary, hosts Nancy and Elena, aired 1. May 2008

 

  • The terrain is everything. The microbe is nothing. Louis Pasteur, father of microbiology, avowal on his deathbed

 

  • Biologie wird im 21. Jahrhundert den heutigen Rang von Chemie und Physik einnehmen. John Naisbitt (*1930) US-amerikanischer Trendforscher

 

  • Die nächsten zwanzig Jahre werden das Zeitalter der Biologie sein, in der Art, wie die letzten zwanzig Jahre das Zeitalter der Mikro-Elektronik waren. John Naisbitt (*1930) US-amerikanischer Trendforscher

1.4   Zitate (engl.) von Elisabet Sahtouris, geobiologist (USA)

  • When the scientists decided that they didn't need God in their worldview, they eliminated God from their Cartesian worldview but kept the idea of an array of mechanisms. Now how do you explain the origin of mechanisms without a creator? By definition, a machine cannot exist without a creator. If they are there and couldn't have been assembled on purpose by an intentional creator, the only alternative is to say they came together by accident. So you got these bizarre theories that literally say that if enough parts of a Boeing 747 blow around in a whirlwind in a junkyard eventually one will assemble itself. This is going to appear to us as perhaps the most bizarre and perhaps harebrained concepts of how things work that has ever been proposed in the history of the world. And I think it will be seen that way in the very near future, because it is fundamentally an illogical point of view. The problem was that they thought you had to choose between God, the purposeful inventor, and accident. We had no theory of self-creation as a perfectly natural, biological, universal event. Now we do, so we don't have to invoke either hypothesis.

 

Sahtouris on the perceptual Triad regarding the origin of life

  1. Non-teleological Perspective (Life is an accident.)
  2. Two primary schools of thought of the Teleological Perspective
    a) Design from Beyond (God or ETI)
    b) Design from Within (Self-Creation)

 

According to Sahtouris Intelligent Design (ID) exists at the interface of Design Beyond and Design Within. By focusing on design, and not the designer, ID bridges these two schools, providing points of commonality.

 

On Darwin's evolutionary theory

  • I think Darwin's theory was good for its time, but remember that its time was within a mechanical worldview framework. To me Darwin's theory is a very mechanical one in which you have "accidents" occur (remember, we talked earlier about explaining a natural world of machinery by accidental development – so that notion was around). Then the "accidental" variations in the genetic material is shaped by the environment, which Darwin saw as a kind of template. If the cogs of these accidents fit into the wheels of the environment, then it would survive and the machine would run on; and if it didn't then it would die out, it would be inappropriate.

 

  • It occurred to me that life seemed to be much too intelligent to proceed in its evolution by accident. I kind of stuck my neck out ten years ago by saying that. I thought that probably genetic errors were repaired. Arthur Koestler had some similar ideas, I believe, he was one of my sources for these ideas.

 

  • Now the geneticists are becoming aware of this at a microscopic level. We can look at what is happening with the relationship of proteins and genes and cell membranes and all that, and it looks very much as if life does not proceed by accident but by design. And, as I said in my book, the nucleus is really a giant library of genes accumulated throughout evolution which can be drawn on under stress. Creatures such as sharks or cockroaches are very well-adapted and don't need to change (I call them bicycles in a jet-age because they still function very well although other species have gone on with totally different paths of evolution). In other words, life changes itself only when it needs to. It knows how to conserve what works well and change what doesn't work well. That is why you get very uneven evolution, not as in Darwinian theory which would predict a very even rate of accident and even rate of evolution for all species. We certainly know that that is not true and no geneticist today would uphold the ideas of Darwin completely.
    Interview with Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, pastist/futurist, presented by Telic Thoughts, interviewer Scott London, August 2007

 

Cooperating Cells corresponding with Global Networking

  • Each one of our cells is a collective of ancient formerly living bacterial types. [...] In the world two billion years ago there were only bacteria. The shift from a very exploitative, destructive lifestyle to this lifestyle of cooperation among bacteria [nucleated cells] is a wonderful parallel to what is going on in the human world today. Interview with Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, pastist/futurist, presented by Telic Thoughts, interviewer Scott London, August 2007

 

  • The Darwinian story only goes to the adolescent part.
    Sustainability happens when species learn to feed each other instead of to fight each other.
    Selfinterest is good as long as it is contained by the selfinterest of a community.
    What we need now is glocalization.
    Together we can make it happen.
    Video presentation with Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, ID promoter, pastist/futurist, former UN consultant, After Darwin, 3 parts, YouTube film, posted 24. April 2007

 

On stranger compassion

  • In however complex a manner compassion [sympathy] may have originated as it is one of high importance to all those animals which aid and defend one another it will have been increased through natural selection for those communities which included the greatest number of the most compassionate [sympathetic] members would flourish best and rear the greatest number of offspring. Charles Darwin

2.   Englische Texte – English section on New Biology

 

3.   Links zum Thema Neue Biologie / New Biology

3.1   Veranstaltungshinweise

3.2   Literatur

3.3   Literatur (engl.)

3.4   Externe Weblinks

3.5   Externe Weblinks (engl.)

  • Wikipedia entries Biology
  • Bruce Lipton, Ph.D., The New Biology source: www.greatmystery.org
  • Michael Kanellos, staff writer, Case Western develops superstrong mice, CNET News, 2. November 2007
    500 transgenic enhanced "mighty mice," known as PEPCK-Cmus mice are produced. They run for six hours (5 or 6 kilometers), eat 60 percent more than standard mice, remain fit and trim, are actually smaller, procreate later, live longer.

3.6   Audio- und Videolinks

3.7   Audio- und Videolinks (engl.)

 

3.8   Audio- und Videolinks (engl.) – Bruce Lipton

 

3.9   Audio- und Videolinks (engl.) – Elisabet Sahtouris

  • Video presentation by Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, pastist/futurist, former UN consultant, on After Darwin, part 1 of 3, YouTube film, 9:26 minutes duration, posted 24. April 2007
    "The Darwinian story only goes to the adolescent part."
    "Sustainability happens when species learn to feed each other instead of to fight each other."
    • After Darwin, Part 2 of 3, 8:39 minutes duration
      "Selfinterest is good as long as it is contained by the selfinterest of a community."
      "What we need now is glocalization."
    • After Darwin, Part 3 of 3, analogy about natural metamorphosis, 3:39 minutes duration
      "Together we can make it happen."
  • Video Interview with Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, pastist/futurist, former UN consultant, presented by Conscious.TV, host Iain McNay, posted 27. October 2009
  • Audio presentation by Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, post-Darwinian creationist evolutionary biologist, pastist/futurist, former UN consultant, on Lessons from Evolution: Learning to Walk in the Rhythm of Life MP3, Stream, presented by Integral Enlightenment, Awakening the Impulses to Evolve series, host Craig Hamilton, 1 hour duration, 28. February 2010

 

3.10   Interne Links

Englische Seiten

Hawkins